{
  "schema": "four.pillars.recommendations.v1",
  "generatedAt": "2026-05-19T00:04:21Z",
  "deployedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60",
  "generationContext": "post-deploy-on-pi",
  "evaluatorObservedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60",
  "source": "/four-pillars-latest.json",
  "publicationPath": "deployment/portal/four-pillars-recommendations.json",
  "publishedFrom": "artifacts/evaluator/four-pillars-recommendations.json",
  "recommendations": [
    {
      "pillar": "OICP",
      "status": "degraded",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "shortDiagnosis": "Runtime route and deploy proof are strong, but deeper operational workflow proof is still thin.",
      "primaryEvidenceGap": "Domain-specific execution proof beyond route and API reachability.",
      "recommendedNextAction": "Open a tracked follow-up to define and capture one stronger OICP business or workflow proof artifact.",
      "escalationTarget": "github-issue",
      "reasoningSummary": "The runtime is working, but the remaining gap is a multi-step evidence problem better tracked than patched ad hoc.",
      "generatedAt": "2026-05-19T00:04:21Z",
      "deployedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60",
      "evaluatorObservedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60"
    },
    {
      "pillar": "Real Estate",
      "status": "degraded",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "shortDiagnosis": "Static publication is proven, but business-data freshness and domain proof remain shallow.",
      "primaryEvidenceGap": "Fresh domain evidence showing the page reflects current real-estate intelligence, not just static reachability.",
      "recommendedNextAction": "Create a GitHub issue to define the next publishable real-estate evidence artifact and freshness rule.",
      "escalationTarget": "github-issue",
      "reasoningSummary": "This is not a runtime break, it is a product-evidence gap that needs tracked follow-up.",
      "generatedAt": "2026-05-19T00:04:21Z",
      "deployedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60",
      "evaluatorObservedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60"
    },
    {
      "pillar": "Community Sandbox / Living Lab",
      "status": "degraded",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "shortDiagnosis": "Primary routes and deploy alignment are proven, but the next confidence gain depends on stronger app-level proof.",
      "primaryEvidenceGap": "A durable sandbox-specific proof artifact beyond route health, such as a representative flow or usage signal.",
      "recommendedNextAction": "Use codex to scope and implement one low-risk sandbox evidence artifact or app-level proof surface.",
      "escalationTarget": "codex",
      "reasoningSummary": "The gap is implementation-heavy inside the repo, but still bounded and evidence-oriented.",
      "generatedAt": "2026-05-19T00:04:21Z",
      "deployedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60",
      "evaluatorObservedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60"
    },
    {
      "pillar": "Fractional CTO",
      "status": "degraded",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "shortDiagnosis": "The page is deployed and reachable, but the evaluator still lacks strategic proof about offer quality or freshness.",
      "primaryEvidenceGap": "Clear strategic definition of the next best evidence that would move this pillar beyond static page proof.",
      "recommendedNextAction": "Use ChatGPT-level strategic analysis to define what higher-confidence Fractional CTO proof should look like before building it.",
      "escalationTarget": "chatgpt",
      "reasoningSummary": "The gap is more about framing the right next evidence than about fixing runtime behavior.",
      "generatedAt": "2026-05-19T00:04:21Z",
      "deployedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60",
      "evaluatorObservedSha": "44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60"
    }
  ]
}