# Four Pillars Recommendations

- Generated at: 2026-05-19T00:04:21Z
- Deployed SHA: `44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60`

## OICP
- Status: **degraded**
- Confidence: **medium**
- Diagnosis: Runtime route and deploy proof are strong, but deeper operational workflow proof is still thin.
- Primary evidence gap: Domain-specific execution proof beyond route and API reachability.
- Recommended next action: Open a tracked follow-up to define and capture one stronger OICP business or workflow proof artifact.
- Escalation target: `github-issue`
- Reasoning: The runtime is working, but the remaining gap is a multi-step evidence problem better tracked than patched ad hoc.
- Evaluator observed SHA: `44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60`

## Real Estate
- Status: **degraded**
- Confidence: **medium**
- Diagnosis: Static publication is proven, but business-data freshness and domain proof remain shallow.
- Primary evidence gap: Fresh domain evidence showing the page reflects current real-estate intelligence, not just static reachability.
- Recommended next action: Create a GitHub issue to define the next publishable real-estate evidence artifact and freshness rule.
- Escalation target: `github-issue`
- Reasoning: This is not a runtime break, it is a product-evidence gap that needs tracked follow-up.
- Evaluator observed SHA: `44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60`

## Community Sandbox / Living Lab
- Status: **degraded**
- Confidence: **medium**
- Diagnosis: Primary routes and deploy alignment are proven, but the next confidence gain depends on stronger app-level proof.
- Primary evidence gap: A durable sandbox-specific proof artifact beyond route health, such as a representative flow or usage signal.
- Recommended next action: Use codex to scope and implement one low-risk sandbox evidence artifact or app-level proof surface.
- Escalation target: `codex`
- Reasoning: The gap is implementation-heavy inside the repo, but still bounded and evidence-oriented.
- Evaluator observed SHA: `44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60`

## Fractional CTO
- Status: **degraded**
- Confidence: **medium**
- Diagnosis: The page is deployed and reachable, but the evaluator still lacks strategic proof about offer quality or freshness.
- Primary evidence gap: Clear strategic definition of the next best evidence that would move this pillar beyond static page proof.
- Recommended next action: Use ChatGPT-level strategic analysis to define what higher-confidence Fractional CTO proof should look like before building it.
- Escalation target: `chatgpt`
- Reasoning: The gap is more about framing the right next evidence than about fixing runtime behavior.
- Evaluator observed SHA: `44cfa0c6feaccef3072391889a80eceb63b13d60`