Enriched Issue Drafts

success

issue-draft-01-oicp

artifacts/implementation/pillars/oicp-workflow-proof-attachment.json

2026-04-23T15:26:52Z

local-executable

Open a tracked follow-up to define and capture one stronger OICP business or workflow proof artifact.

Domain-specific execution proof beyond route and API reachability.

Use artifacts/implementation/pillars/oicp-proof-workflow.json as the first workflow-proof attachment because it already shows intake, processing, and output structure.

Link this workflow proof to a real intake artifact and capture step timestamps.

OICP can look operational from route health alone while the business workflow still lacks concrete execution proof.

The team keeps re-checking /oicp/api/health but still cannot show a completed intake-to-output trail.

operator or workflow owner

Use the current proof seed and add one real intake artifact plus step timestamps in a single follow-up artifact.

Attach one real intake example to the existing OICP proof seed

Add a replayable OICP workflow artifact with timestamps for each step

artifacts/implementation/pillars/oicp-proof-workflow.json

local-executable

Bounded local execution is fully specified: proof seed exists, bounded next step exists, and a deterministic local execution task is available now.

local

Bounded proof-artifact attachment can be created deterministically from the existing OICP workflow seed without modifying repo code or opening issues.

True

• Attach one real intake record to the workflow proof seed
• Publish one timestamped workflow replay summary from the existing OICP path

• Workflow proof stays abstract if it is never tied to a real intake artifact
• Operators may over-trust API health without business-flow evidence

human-review

Create a GitHub issue to define the next publishable real-estate evidence artifact and freshness rule.

Fresh domain evidence showing the page reflects current real-estate intelligence, not just static reachability.

Use artifacts/implementation/pillars/real-estate-proof-freshness.json as the quick publishable artifact because it already ties insight freshness to attribution.

Add automated freshness recalculation and proof of last refresh actor.

The pillar can appear healthy because the page is reachable even when the underlying market signal is stale.

Operators point to the page as proof, but cannot show when the insight was last refreshed or by whom.

operator or domain analyst

Create one new real-estate evidence artifact using the proof-seed freshness fields and one current listing insight.

Publish one refreshed property insight using the existing freshness proof format

Add a repeatable freshness artifact with refresh actor and refresh timestamp

artifacts/implementation/pillars/real-estate-proof-freshness.json

human-review

The next step depends on human judgment, domain framing, or approval-sensitive choices, so it should stay in review before action.

human-review

A publishable real-estate freshness artifact needs operator judgment about current domain facts and should not be synthesized automatically in this MVP.

False

• Add one refreshed property insight snapshot using the existing freshness structure
• Add one operator-verified refresh note tied to the proof seed

• Static page availability can mask stale property intelligence
• Freshness claims may drift without a visible last-refresh artifact

ready-for-create

Use codex to scope and implement one low-risk sandbox evidence artifact or app-level proof surface.

A durable sandbox-specific proof artifact beyond route health, such as a representative flow or usage signal.

Use artifacts/implementation/pillars/sandbox-proof-flow.json as the first replayable journey artifact because it already defines join, task, and output.

Capture one replayable example with timestamps and moderation state changes.

The sandbox can look available while still lacking evidence that a participant can complete a useful path.

Health checks pass, but no one can show a recent participant flow that reached a useful output.

operator or product builder

Record one real sandbox journey in the current proof-seed format and publish it as a linked artifact.

Capture one concrete join-to-output example using the current sandbox proof flow

Add a reusable journey replay artifact with timestamps and moderation state transitions

artifacts/implementation/pillars/sandbox-proof-flow.json

ready-for-create

The draft is concrete enough to become a tracked GitHub issue, but it points to repo or implementation work outside the bounded local executor.

escalate

The recommended next step implies app-level or repo-behavior work, so it stays out of the bounded local artifact-only executor.

False

• Capture one replayable participant journey using the existing flow proof seed
• Add one usage-signal artifact tied to a concrete sandbox task output

• Route health may be mistaken for evidence of a functioning participant loop
• The pillar remains hard to explain without one concrete user journey artifact

human-review

Use ChatGPT-level strategic analysis to define what higher-confidence Fractional CTO proof should look like before building it.

Clear strategic definition of the next best evidence that would move this pillar beyond static page proof.

Use artifacts/implementation/pillars/cto-proof-strategy.json as the first advisory proof artifact because it already captures recommendation and decision logic.

Tie the advisory output to a reusable recommendation template with explicit scoring.

The page is reachable, but there is still little proof that the advisory output is specific, current, and reusable.

Operators can show the page but cannot point to one bounded recommendation artifact that demonstrates decision quality.

operator or strategy lead

Turn the current proof seed into one publishable recommendation example with explicit scoring and one client scenario.

Create one concrete recommendation example from the existing CTO proof seed

Add a reusable recommendation template with explicit scoring and decision criteria

artifacts/implementation/pillars/cto-proof-strategy.json

human-review

The next step depends on human judgment, domain framing, or approval-sensitive choices, so it should stay in review before action.

human-review

Fractional CTO next evidence is strategy-heavy and approval-sensitive, so it should stay with human review before any automation.

False

• Ground the next advisory artifact in one concrete operator scenario
• Add one scored recommendation example using the existing strategy proof seed

• Advisory quality stays subjective without one explicit recommendation example
• Static page proof can overstate readiness for real advisory use